Saturday, April 20, 2024
18 C
Sydney

Retired pope responds to critics

Most read

Pope Benedict XVI waves as he leaves his final general audience in St Peter’s Square at the Vatican in this 27 February, 2013, file photo. PHOTO: CNS, Paul Haring

Responding to criticism of notes he published about the roots of the clerical sexual abuse crisis, retired Pope Benedict XVI said the fact that the critiques barely mentioned God proved his point.

“As far as I can see, in most reactions to my contribution, God does not appear at all,” which is “exactly what I wanted to emphasise” as the central problem, he wrote in a brief note to Herder Korrespondenz, according to KNA, the German Catholic news agency.

In April, the retired pope sent a compilation of what he described as “some notes” on the crisis to Klerusblatt, a German-language Catholic monthly journal for clergy in Bavaria.

- Advertisement -

Seeing the crisis as rooted in the “egregious event” of the cultural and sexual revolution in the Western world in the 1960s and a collapse of belief in the existence and authority of absolute truth and God, the retired pope said the primary task at hand is to reassert the joyful truth of God’s existence and of the church as holding the true deposit of faith.

Pope Benedict
In this 2014 file photo, retired Pope Benedict XVI arrives for the beatification Mass of Blessed Paul VI celebrated by Pope Francis in St. Peter’s Square at the Vatican. PHOTO: CNS/Paul Haring

Most of the criticism, though, focused on Pope Benedict seeming to blame the cultural and sexual revolution of the ’60s, especially when many cases of priests sexually abusing children occurred before that time even if the public found out only recently.

In the new note, Pope Benedict said the “the general deficit in the reception of my text” was a lack of willingness to engage with his contention that abuse is related to a lack of faith and strong morals.

He used as an example a critique in the July issue of Herder Korrespondenz by the historian Birgit Aschmann.

“In the four pages of the article by Mrs Aschmann, the word God, which I made the central point of the question, does not appear,” he wrote.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -