|

Sydney
10 February 2002
Home
Archive
Subscribe
Links
Contact
Archbishop steps into fray over detainees
Worldwide theology video link
Archbishop clarifies divorce ban claims
New heads for 23 Sydney schools
Praise for Catholic Women's League as it launches 'into deep'
Archbishop: Red Mass is a reminder of 'different truth'
Like 'white Australia' policy - bishop
Woomera 'concentration camp'
Welfare groups offer care for children
Ecumenical study programs for Lent
Vietnamese New Year Mass
Editorial: Time for a 'fair go'?
Letters: Think of what the Lord's Prayer says
Conversation: Youth, mission and a 'call to sainthood' - Selina Hasham, World Youth Day co-ordinator
Reflections: In the steps of the Good Samaritan
Pope John Paul II: pilgrimage of peace
As one in hope
Lent: Words of Jesus 'ring out for us today'
No school, no running water for the folk who live in this not so super Dome
Inspirations: Would-be pilgrims' progress
|
Archbishop clarifies divorce ban claims
Claims in the media that Pope John Paul II has called on Catholic judges
and lawyers to boycott divorce cases are the result of misleading English
translations of his address to a Vatican court, says the Archbishop of
Sydney, Dr George Pell.
Archbishop Pell (pictured) said: "The con troversial passages taken up
by the media are from a long, technical address given by the Holy Father
on January 28, 2002, to the officials of the Roman Rota, one of the senior
courts for canon (or church) law.
"The Holy Father was repeating traditional Catholic teaching on the indissolubility
of marriage, based on New Testament texts such as Matthew 19.3-12. He
followed the Second Vatican Council by repeating the council teaching
that divorce has become a plague and risks becoming the norm, so that
lifelong marriage becomes the exception. Naturally all Catholic agencies
will try to oppose this trend.
"Lifelong marriage is not just an ideal for Catholics, but one of the
bulwarks of society, based on the natural law which is foundational for
all societies.
"The English translations of paragraph 9 are clumsy and somewhat misleading
on the role of Catholic judges and lawyers in civil divorce proceedings.
"Catholic judges (and, by inference, lawyers) can participate for the
common good in divorce proceedings, eg to help ensure the legal rights
of all participants, such as the care of children, the protection of inheritances
and distribution of property. Sometimes even parents' access to children
and maintenance payments are only agreed in such proceedings.
"In Australia, Catholic marriage annulment procedures can only go forward
after civil divorce proceedings are complete.
"The challenge for Catholics faced with marriage breakdown lies not so
much in civil divorce proceedings, but in the breakdown of the marriage
itself, regularly traumatic, and the consideration of remarriage, perhaps
without the Church's blessing.
"The Holy Father refers to paragraph 2383 of the Catechism of the Catholic
Church and repeats that teaching:
'The separation of spouses while maintaining the marriage bond can be
legitimate in certain cases provided for by canon law. If civil divorce
remains the only possible way of ensuring certain legal rights, the care
of the children, or the protection of inheritance, it can be tolerated
and does not constitute a moral offence.' (para 2383)"
Catholic lawyers have welcomed the arch bishop's statement.
John McCarthy QC, president of the St Thomas More Society, the guild of
Catholic lawyers in NSW, said Dr Pell had assured him that the Pope's
remarks "as appearing in early press reports" had been misinterpreted
or mistranslated in relevant parts.
"Family Law judges act for the common good in matters involving, in particular,
the care of children as well as the property and other rights of the parties
to a marriage," Mr McCarthy said.
"Barristers and solicitors participate on behalf of the parties as officers
of the Court.
"All of them are required by Australian law to seek reconciliation between
the parties and the settlement of their differences - too often this is
not possible.
"Since judges and lawyers in family law proceedings have proper and grave
moral reasons for their professional participation, they are not being
criticised by the Holy Father.
"They are certainly not being told to withdraw from such professional
activity or judicial roles."
|