Sydney
28 January 2001

Australia 2001, more selfish but sometimes very generous: Cardinal Clancy’s Australia Day Message

Australia Day special: Into a second century

Cardinal – Envoy for World Day of the Sick

Pope John Paul II appoints record number of cardinals

Honours List – let us know

Final vows for Sydney man at Wagga

Grants for PND helpline

Life after Jubilee: the mission continues

Editorial: Witnessing to Christ

Letters: Did you know Fr Dunlea?

And justice for all: John Boersig, director, Newcastle Legal Centre

Thoughts on the baptism of Jesus

Health care on a shoestring in India

Cosgrove pays homage to Alma Mater

Bringing Ned Kelly to life

Under the oak tree: Act One

2001 – International Year of Volunteers

28 Jan 01

Thoughts on the baptism of Jesus

By Andrew Murray SM

A question that must come to mind when we contemplate the occasion of the baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist is why did Jesus submit to baptism? The question is present in one way or another in each of the synoptic Gospels. John proclaimed that he baptised with water but that one would come after him who would baptise with the Spirit. Again, John recognised Jesus and protested that Jesus should baptise him, but Jesus insisted that the normal pattern be kept.

Part of the answer is that Jesus, though he was God, came to be one like us. Change and salvation came into the world not in the person of a mighty god, a powerful king or a fierce warrior but in the person of one who, until he began to act, was little distinguishable from the rest of us. As he took on full human form with all its weakness, so he accepted baptism from John. His ministry began quietly, though from the beginning recognised by the Father.

In Isaiah 42, the song of the servant of Yahweh takes up this theme. “He does not cry out or shout aloud, or make his voice heard in the streets. He does not break the crushed reed, nor quench the wavering flame.” Then, however, it takes a different turn. “Faithfully he brings true justice; he will neither waver, nor be crushed until true justice is established on earth, for the islands are awaiting his law.”

How is it that one so mild could bring justice to the world? If he was meant to bring justice, how is it that 2,000 years later people still go hungry and nations are ravished by wars? Would not a powerful king or a fierce warrior have been more successful?

To answer these questions, we have to recognise that there are many kinds of justice. There is the justice according to which we expect to be paid when we are employed to do work. There is the justice according to which we expect that all human beings will have enough to eat. There is the justice according to which we expect that nations will live at peace with one another. Beneath all of these, however, there is a more profound form of justice according to which every human being can expect to be recognised as a human being and as loveable by other human beings. It is this last, I believe, that Jesus primarily came to establish.

This is the justice that exists wherever that love that regards each human being as outstandingly precious exists. Even in the direst of situations it exists where Christians live as Christians and where noble souls minister to those that suffer.

We continue to fight for all forms of justice, but this form, which underpins all others, can exist wherever the law of love exists.

Father Murray teaches philosophy at the Catholic Institute of Sydney.