Sydney
11 February 2001

Be reconciled

State-sanctioned suicide back on agenda in NSW

Archbishop tells Christians: get political

Bishops appoint new NCEC chair

Brisbane’s archbishop chairs international working group

Altar Servers Guild

Entourage for World Day of the Sick

More NSW Catholics for Australia Day Honours

Alarm over use of ‘chemical restraint’

Youth 2000 – bringing young people together

Caritas calls for donations for India earthquake crisis

Pushing past the pornographers – the art of censorship

Editorial: To die or to kill?

Letters: Communion Conundrums

My sister my liberator: Anne Nguyen Thi Ham-Tieu

Reflection: The making of good citizens

Young Catholics break down cultural barriers at youth forum

Reconciliation between people only realistic after reconcilation with God

Mass and social justice go together

Euthanasia – not the only way to go

Under the oak tree: Act Three

11 Feb 01

Reflection: The making of good citizens

By Andrew Murray SM



A consistent theme during the celebrations of the anniversary of the Snowy Mountains Project last year was gratitude at the opportunity that the project had given to people from all parts of the world to settle in Australia and to make good.

In interviews, person after person spoke about how grateful they had been that nobody had worried about where they came from or about what difficulties might have affected their past. All that mattered was that they worked hard.

These people have become good citizens, and part of what has made them so is the welcome they received when they first arrived in Australia.

This was not a new experience for Australia. At the beginning of European settlement, many convicts, who had been condemned in Britain as unreformable and of a bad class, became model citizens when freed and granted land in the new colony. In fact, it is a principle of life that when people who have lived in difficult circumstances are given fresh opportunity they often flourish. If this giving is accompanied by generosity, they remain grateful in their allegiance to whomever was generous to them.

It seems to me that this lesson is one that we as a nation and especially our Federal Government need to learn again in relation to asylum seekers and refugees.

Instability and internal war in parts of the world will ensure that Australia will be obliged to accept refugees from different parts of the world for some years to come for reasons both of justice and international convention. This is happening at present and involves not only those chosen by immigration authorities in distant camps but also those asylum seekers, such as the ‘boat people’, whose arrival in Australia is unauthorised.

At present we treat these people in the worst possible way, yet we will no doubt expect that those who stay will become the best possible citizens. Granted that a wide ranges of issues and problems, some of them intractable, surround the questions of asylum and refugee status, there still seems to be something fundamentally wrong about the way in which we treat unauthorised entries, even if we judge this only in terms of our own long-term interests.

Practices like long-term mandatory detention, detention of children, granting of only temporary protection visas to proven refugees, placement of detention centres in remote areas so that humanitarian support is not available, long delays, uneven treatment of people with similar cases, installation of high security fences and razor wire and criticism of charities that have supported refugees released into the community all seem designed to ensure that people, whom we will expect to become good citizens, will have nothing to look back on in gratitude.

Many of these measures are simply punitive and attempts to stem the flow of asylum seekers. The government could do better, if it better understood human nature.

Fr Murray teaches philosophy at the Catholic Institute of Sydney.