23 December 2001


Church under fire over carer time-off initiative

University’s compassion is a winner

M5 fun day raises $20,000

Archbishop’s Christmas message

Faith is the key, says new bishop

Facelift for St Brigid’s

Caritas hits record $5.75m

Centacare rewards its volunteers

New auxiliary bishop for Perth

Animal theme wins trip, computer

Our reputation ‘shattered’

Pope’s apology ‘challenges Church’

Editorial: Christmas and the ironies of peace

Letters: Third Rite

Conversation: From pastoral life to priest’s mentor - Fr Julian Porteous, seminary rector

Reflections: Names? They’re not just identity tags

A new era: 2001 in Review

Inspirations: Gospel stories connect the Manger to the Crucifix and Resurrection


Church under fire over carer time-off initiative

The Catholic Church has come under attack from the NSW Anti-Discrimination Board over a decision of the Full Bench of the Industrial Relations Commission.

The Catholic Commission for Employment Relations, the industrial relations arm of the Catholic Church in NSW, recently extended its groundbreaking personal/carer’s leave provision to most of its employees with the approval of the NSW Industrial Relations Commission.

Unions involved also agreed to the clause.

But the NSW Anti-Discrimination Board, which intervened in Industrial Relations Commission (IRC) proceedings to vary seven state awards so as to extend the leave to more employees, has objected to the wording of the new clause.

It objects to a distinction made between family and other carers.

The IRC, in its judgement, highlighted that the proposed award would grant access to all employees to support “a family member or other person who needs the employee’s care and support”.

It said the new award was “a positive step forward for employees working in Catholic workplaces”.

The executive director of the Catholic Commission

for Employment Relations, Michael McDonald, said

the Church had been a leader in granting carer’s leave, which had been extended to its employees since the early 1990s.

It was concerned, he added, to uphold its views on marriage and family.

The Anti-Discrimination Board said: “The argument is not so much about the entitlements people have but the label which is put on people covered by the awards.”

The president of the board, Chris Puplick, said the board was concerned that someone in a de facto relationship claiming carer’s leave would have to name the person being cared for and “bear the consequences”. It viewed this as potentially discriminatory and a contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act.

The Nurses’ Association said the board’s attack on the new award did not make sense and reflects poorly on the board itself.

The award had taken nearly three years of effort by the association’s officers, the association said. Mr Puplick’s “unnecessary intervention” had “nearly derailed it”.