Sydney
22 April 2001

On top of the world

Ruddock takes on Social Justice Council: Immigration Minister claims refugee centres are better than many Australian homes

Cardinal Clancy in stable condition following surgery

Secular press helps build interfaith relations – by mistake

John Paul II Institute to take students from July

Deputy Ridgeway – a first for Aborigines

International meeting of Good Samaritan Sisters

Our readers help raise $24,000 towards ‘rubbish dump’ childcare centre

Call for Catholic parents to enter schools debate

Dutch euthanasia “cheap solution” – Right to Life

Church backs parental leave for casuals

East Timor’s Bishop Belo to receive honorary degree

Quo vadis adoption? The search goes on …

Editorial: Abortion is forever too

Letters: Injustice and poverty

One Nation spectre gave birth to Unity: Dr Peter Wong MLC

Reflection: On the future of Anzac Day

Titanic mystery shares stage with classics

Wrapping up basic education

Celebrating women and family

22 Apr 01

Church backs parental leave for casuals

By Chris Hook



The Catholic Church has thrown its weight behind a trade union bid to secure parental leave for casual workers who have been employed for longer than a year.

An application to include parental leave for long-term casuals in new federal awards has been made to the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) by the Australian Council of Trade Unions as part of their ‘Work and Family Balance’ campaign.

The application is for unpaid maternity or paternity leave for casual workers who have been employed by the same employer for more than 12 months.

Some 29 per cent of Australian workers are employed casually and more than 60 per cent have been employed for longer than 12 months.

In a written submission to the AIRC, the Australian Catholic Commission for Employment Relations (ACCER) said the provision of parental leave for casual employees was “equitable” and would “assist the employee in balancing work and family commitments.”

But, although it supports AIRC’s submission, ACCER has questioned the classification of workers employed by the same employer for more than a year as “long term” casual.

“In fact, they are more properly viewed as full-time or part-time employees,” said ACCER.

“It would appear that there is an increasing number of employees being engaged as ‘casual employees’ over an extended period. This contradicts the commonly accepted understanding of what is meant by a ‘true’ casual employee – that is an employee engaged on a short-term, irregular and uncertain basis.”

However ACCER conceded this was not the current reality when it came to ‘casual’ workers. This “misclassification … has occurred, is occurring and, in all likelihood, may continue to occur in the future,” it said.